A while back I wrote a piece about fake news
called, “Fake News and Social Media.” The inspiration for the article wasn’t
anything being reported on any of the network news or news network programs
although the issue that inspired my piece was, finally, being reported on these
news mediums. Let me clarify what it is I’m talking about specifically. You
see, while scrolling through my Google+ feed, I saw a comment posted by someone
whom I don’t really know. I don’t, even, recall exactly what it was that this
person had written and posted. All I remember is that I disagreed with whatever
it was that this person had posted so I “replied” to the post with my own
commentary and views about what I thought regarding their comments.
This person (again, whom I didn’t know then nor
do I know now) had “followed” me, but I don’t recall (actually) returning the
favor and “following” them. I’m not saying that it’s not possible that I did so
because I used to follow people who followed me when I, initially, set up my
Google+ profile, which I was prompted to do when I created my Gmail account. At
any rate, the “why’s” and “how’s” are irrelevant. The only thing that is
relevant is the fact that I do not know who this person is or is not within the
real or cyber world. In fact, I don’t (even) recall the name of the person I’m
referring to and there’s no way for me to go back and attempt to find the
person’s name because I wound up blocking them because I believed that the
individual wasn’t “real” – meaning, I believed that the profile and name
created by whomever created it was fake. Keep in mind, all of this took place
prior to what is now being reported by the legitimate news outlets regarding Russia-gate
and the more than 1,000 Russian paid, internet trolls pushing propaganda/fake
news.
I should mention that I have the ability to
check stats for all of my blogs. Within the content of those stats is the
country/countries viewing my blog. Next to the United States, Russia is the
country with the second highest number of visitors. After Russia it varies a
lot. But, along with many in Western Europe (I love you Europe), I have many
Eastern European visitors. So – since my Google+ account automatically posts
every article I write for “The New World Disorder” and every poem or article I
write for “Are You Serious?” it makes sense that Russian paid trolls would have
targeted me.
Now, back to the point of what unfolded as a
result of my response to this person’s comment. When I made whatever comment I
made in response to whatever this person (whom I believed, at the time, was a “made-up/fictional
profile”) posted she (I don’t remember her name, but I do remember it was a
female profile) replied with the most bizarre thing I had ever heard in my
life. Though I don’t recall what she said at the beginning of her response I,
do, remember her wild allegations about (then) candidate Hillary Clinton
running a human trafficking organization out of a pizzeria and referred to this
so-called scandal as “Pizza-gate.” Keep in mind, this is before the mainstream
media/legitimate news organizations were reporting about “Pizza-gate” because this
online exchange occurred prior to when the gun-wielding man entered that pizzeria
intending to “take down the bad guys.” That incident, of course, led to a
follow-up report with the man who fabricated that fake news story that earned
him something like $8,000 (if memory serves me correctly).
I wish I had done some digging on the same day
that the, literally, unbelievable slew of bull shit was given to me during that
online back and forth with a person I was (immediately) told by my intuition wasn’t
real (meaning, she – who was likely a “he” – was a fabricated profile/person).
I don’t know that there would have been any, actual, facts about the Pizza-gate
scandal at that time since the story hadn’t been investigated properly until
the man with the gun entered the restaurant seeking justice. As a side note,
the fact that someone who was gullible enough to believe such an obvious
fabrication is able to own a gun should be added to the many other equally
disturbing facts supporting the need to reform gun legislation. I’m not saying
we should do away with the right to bear arms. I’m just saying that we need to
enforce the laws that are already in place as well as make some additions such
as “mental health screening” and (in light of this situation and others, which
are similar) the need for IQ testing.
Anyway, it seems as if things happen to me or that
I’m privy to prior to those exact things being reported or receiving attention
by other, much more influential sources in a prodigious way. Just before the
man with a gun goes into the pizzeria – an insane, fictional person tries to
sell me on Pizza-gate and a search engine that I should use rather than Google
(or other search engines that produce factual, research type results) called “GoodGopher”
dot com (I don’t want to enter in an actual link). Then, because of the close
call that could have resulted in many, innocent people being killed by the
gun-toting man, the story breaks about writers being paid to fabricate and
publish (online) stories then pass them off as legitimate news. When that story
broke and was televised by MSNBC I, then, wrote my piece about fake news
(mentioned in the opening line above). But, it wasn’t until very recently that
the reality of internet trolls pushing these fake news stories via social
networking sites became public or known widely (if you’ve read my “Fake News
and Social Media” article you’ll know why I don’t like to say, “social media”).
When I write anything (and I, do, mean
anything) nowadays I tweet out the link to whatever article I’ve written. It’s
not to bring myself any notoriety. It’s not, even, to generate ad revenue from
my blog. Because, believe me, although I have ads on two of my blogs the total
revenue earned from both sites is $1.27 and that is from my other blog “Are You
Serious?” That blog began running ads in 2013. So, in four years’ time, the
total revenue generated is $1.27 and that money is held, without being
deposited into the blogger’s bank account, until there’s a minimum of one
hundred dollars. That means, although I’ve earned a whopping one dollar and
twenty-seven cents in four years’ time, I will most likely be dead by the time
I’ve earned enough money ($100) to actually be paid.
So, my point is that my linking everything I
write into my tweets is done to bring attention to things that may, otherwise,
go unnoticed or to bring a different perspective to an issue that’s already
being discussed or reported by the legitimate news outlets. If anyone’s ever
paid any attention to the links I put out in tweets they will notice that my
first tweeted link is addressed to @msnbc with additional recipients, usually,
being @maddow, @chucktodd and @billmaher. In some cases I’ve included @realdonaldtrump,
but (usually) when I send him anything it isn’t an article I’ve written because
there are way, too many facts for him to believe. Usually, when tweeting the
so-called president, I just send him an insult like the one a few weeks ago
(after hearing how much money he’s been spending to go to Florida every
weekend). I tweeted him a note that said something along the lines of, “How can
you go golfing in FL every weekend while gutting programs for the poor/needy?
You entitled prick!” The last line was verbatim, but the first may have been –
I’m not sure, but it was the gist of what I said.
That’s all for now. I just felt I should “put
it out there” all of the things that have happened with which I’ve been aware
prior to those things being “put out there” for the multitudes of people that
are now aware because of those things being put out there. From now on, as soon
as I get a whiff of any hidden stench or my gut (intuition) tells me that
something’s not right – I will be sure to write about it first and be glad
about it (or regret it) later.
No comments:
Post a Comment